[Users] ikelifetime and keylife

From: PRINCE Jean-Francois (jfprince_at_elv.enic.fr)
Date: Mon Oct 21 2002 - 11:22:13 CEST

• Next message: Kaustubh.Kumbhalkar_at_lntinfotech.com: "[Users] distinct tunnels for distinct protocols"
• Previous message: Jonathan Marks: "[Users] Freeswan GW to Win2K RW - Re-key Problem 2."
• Next in thread: Sam Sgro: "Re: [Users] ikelifetime and keylife"
• Reply: Sam Sgro: "Re: [Users] ikelifetime and keylife"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hello,

I've got a simple question:

What is the difference between ikelifetime and keylife? When you
define keylife at 1h all the SA change so the IKE keys also. Is it
useful for rekeying IKE and not redone SA? So Ikelifetime must be
inferior to keylife?

Thanks
JF

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

• Next message: Kaustubh.Kumbhalkar_at_lntinfotech.com: "[Users] distinct tunnels for distinct protocols"
• Previous message: Jonathan Marks: "[Users] Freeswan GW to Win2K RW - Re-key Problem 2."
• Next in thread: Sam Sgro: "Re: [Users] ikelifetime and keylife"
• Reply: Sam Sgro: "Re: [Users] ikelifetime and keylife"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Oct 23 2002 - 05:20:35 CEST