From: Ken Bantoft (ken_at_freeswan.ca)
Date: Sat Oct 26 2002 - 05:34:01 CEST
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Joe Philipps wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 03:29:27AM -0400, Claudia Schmeing wrote:
>
> As far as the Contivity goes...I wonder what was meant by "partially."
> Hmmm... I have a tunnel using a PSK with a client's Contivity
> established as I type. And from comments on the Users list, it seems
> some of them have used at least the OpenSSL suite and the X.509
> patches to do X.509 auth with these boxen. I sure wish it did
> plain-vanilla RSA keys instead of the more complicated X.509 system.
> Oh, well.
Partially meaning you can't do the Username/Password ala Windows Client
with it. Could you post your PSK config details? I'd be most interested
in them, since I've got 4 Contivities myself, and haven't had the energy
to fight with them to get FreeS/WAN interoperating.
I submitted the X.509 details to Claudia (Andreas's links + comments) a
few days ago, so they'll probably be in the next revision.
--
Ken Bantoft The Unoffical FreeS/WAN Site:
ken_at_freeswan.ca http://www.freeswan.ca
PGP Key: finger ken_at_bantoft.org
"We can factor the number 15 with quantum computers. We
can also factor the number 15 with a dog trained to bark
three times." -- Robert Harley, 5/12/01, Sci.crypt
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Oct 27 2002 - 05:20:32 CET