Re: [Users] Can't see SCO box

From: Greg J (gregj_at_freetech.ca)
Date: Tue Oct 29 2002 - 15:29:34 CET

• Next message: Michal Gust: "[Users] Freeswan and Cisco using RSA signatures auth."
• Previous message: George Hadjichristofi: "[Users] options field in inner ip header"
• In reply to: Igmar Palsenberg: "Re: [Users] Can't see SCO box"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

That was it, thanks!

Greg J
Systems Engineering
Freeway Technologies Inc
www.freetech.ca
----- Original Message -----
From: "Igmar Palsenberg" <maillist_at_jdimedia.nl>
To: "Greg J" <gregj_at_freetech.ca>
Cc: <users_at_lists.freeswan.org>
Sent: October 29, 2002 10:22 AM
Subject: Re: [Users] Can't see SCO box

>
> > I have a very simple VPN working between two small subnets. Each subnet
> > consists of a few Win boxes and a SCO Unix box. I can ping the Win boxes
> > in either subnet from the other subnet but cannot get a ping response
> > from the SCO boxes through the VPN. Pinging each SCO box from it's own
> > subnet is no problem. Gotta be something simple but I can't figure it
> > out. Can someone enlighten me? I need access to the SCO boxes through
> > the VPN.
>
> Try a netstat -rn on the SCO box, it should list a default gateway which
> makes sense. Since you can ping the Windows boxen this is the most likely
> problem.
>
>
>
> Igmar
>
>

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

• Next message: Michal Gust: "[Users] Freeswan and Cisco using RSA signatures auth."
• Previous message: George Hadjichristofi: "[Users] options field in inner ip header"
• In reply to: Igmar Palsenberg: "Re: [Users] Can't see SCO box"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Oct 30 2002 - 05:20:34 CET