From: Serge La Chance (slachance_at_onesystem.ca)
Date: Wed Oct 30 2002 - 15:44:50 CET
On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 19:36, Ken Bantoft wrote:
I am not sure if I misunderstand you or you misunderstood me but my
situation right now is this:
WIN2k (Static External IP)
\/
INTERNET (SSH over No VPN)
\/
GATEWAY (Static External IP and Internal IP)
\/
VPN Tunnel
\/
Roadwarrior (Static Internal IP and Dynamic External IP)
If you are thinking of VPN the WIN2K box, I guess its something I should
consider. But then I have to block what the machines can see since, I
want limited trust between the WIN2k and the other machines. The other
machines are all RedHat 6.2 machines if you needed to know.
If you need more information or I misunderstood you I am listening.
Serge La Chance
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Serge La Chance wrote:
>
> > To whom may help me,
> >
> > My setup:
> >
> > Win2K --> Internet --> Gateway --> VPN Tunnel over the internet -->
> > Roadwarriors (ssh servers)
> >
> > I am trying to ssh to my Roadwarriors on the web who are assigned dynamic
> > addresses. I was trying to accomplish this by initiating an ssh connection
> > to the specific ports on my gateway. Then port forwarding these ports to the
> > internal addresses of my Roadwarriors on port 22.
> > My goal is to simulate my Roadwarriors to have static addresses.
>
> Checkout the X.509 patch - it has support for Virtual IPs - eg: you can
> assign an IP from your local lan to your roadwarriors. Thus, they'd
> essentially have a static ip on your localsubnet which you could refer to.
>
> Sounds like it will do what you need.
>
> Ken
>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Oct 31 2002 - 05:20:35 CET