From: Sam Sgro (sam_at_freeswan.org)
Date: Tue Nov 05 2002 - 08:27:37 CET
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Jussi Torhonen wrote:
> Deploying FreeSWAN v1.99 requires x509patch-0.9.15-freeswan-1.99 which
> is available already. But are those alg 0.8.0 patches compatible with
> x509patched FreeSWAN 1.99? What about NAT-Traversal and
> notify_delete-freeswan patches?
I'm curious about your use of the word require in this sentence. :)
Try applying the 1.98b based patches on 1.99; there's a good chance they will
work without much, if any alteration. 0.9.15 for 1.98b patched 1.99 with only
two offset hunks, I believe.
- --
Sam Sgro
sam_at_freeswan.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
Comment: For the matching public key, finger the Reply-To: address.
iQCVAwUBPcdy6kOSC4btEQUtAQHmJgQAxeSgg1ENJuVNMNpTvawNbsYAa57vXDzF
dlAxHsUDvCtC4oGRmspHUhJ1N5AYiLqjlC7xvi3pdV6vX4y4+N7PK00YRO2UqGN5
GuHE1vb4o3O0hvmf175uC9yXR8u0Fr9eLcaU5C+qt0iSl7RFp60NecgWbM7NRI5h
JYTCCdNf7UY=
=IzlL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Nov 06 2002 - 05:20:36 CET