[Users] NAT-ed IPSEC connections to FreeSwan/IPSEC

From: Ad Koster (lidad_at_zeelandnet.nl)
Date: Tue Nov 26 2002 - 21:47:27 CET

• Next message: Ray Simard: "[Users] "Funny website" messages: Klez virus (surprise, surprise...)"
• Previous message: Qiang Zhang: "Re: [Users] can't compiling on Redhat8.0"
• Next in thread: Sam Sgro: "Re: [Users] NAT-ed IPSEC connections to FreeSwan/IPSEC"
• Reply: Sam Sgro: "Re: [Users] NAT-ed IPSEC connections to FreeSwan/IPSEC"
• Reply: Stephen J. Bevan: "[Users] NAT-ed IPSEC connections to FreeSwan/IPSEC"
• Reply: Ken Bantoft: "Re: [Users] NAT-ed IPSEC connections to FreeSwan/IPSEC"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

According to the FreeSWan documentation several limitations do exist
concerning NAT-ed connections/FreeSwan.

Is this a FreeSwan-only problem or an IPSEC limitation in general??

For example: is it possible to set up a connection using SSH Sentinel
behind a 3Com OfficeConnect gateway to another gateway running FreeSwan?

Thanks
Ad

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

• Next message: Ray Simard: "[Users] "Funny website" messages: Klez virus (surprise, surprise...)"
• Previous message: Qiang Zhang: "Re: [Users] can't compiling on Redhat8.0"
• Next in thread: Sam Sgro: "Re: [Users] NAT-ed IPSEC connections to FreeSwan/IPSEC"
• Reply: Sam Sgro: "Re: [Users] NAT-ed IPSEC connections to FreeSwan/IPSEC"
• Reply: Stephen J. Bevan: "[Users] NAT-ed IPSEC connections to FreeSwan/IPSEC"
• Reply: Ken Bantoft: "Re: [Users] NAT-ed IPSEC connections to FreeSwan/IPSEC"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 28 2002 - 05:20:52 CET