From: Jfabricio - Departamento de TI (jfabricio_at_greenwichint.com.br)
Date: Wed Nov 27 2002 - 19:45:56 CET
SPAM: -------------------- Start SpamAssassin results ----------------------
SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered
SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future.
SPAM: See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
SPAM:
SPAM: Content analysis details: (6.60 hits, 5 required)
SPAM: REFERENCES (-0.5 points) Has a valid-looking References header
SPAM: USER_AGENT_OE (0.2 points) X-Mailer header indicates a non-spam MUA (Outlook Express)
SPAM: MAY_BE_FORGED (0.0 points) 'Received:' has 'may be forged' warning
SPAM: LARGE_COLLECTION (0.2 points) BODY: Possible porn - Large Number of movies, pics
SPAM: SPAM_PHRASE_01_02 (0.5 points) BODY: Spam phrases score is 01 to 02 (low)
SPAM: [score: 1]
SPAM: QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT (-0.8 points) BODY: Contains what looks like a quoted email text
SPAM: PGP_SIGNATURE (-0.5 points) BODY: Contains a PGP-signed message
SPAM: KNOWN_MAILING_LIST (-0.1 points) Email came from some known mailing list software
SPAM: RCVD_IN_ORBS (2.2 points) RBL: Received via a relay in orbs.dorkslayers.com
SPAM: [RBL check: found 12.122.207.200.orbs.dorkslayers.com.]
SPAM: RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM (0.4 points) RBL: Received via a relay in relays.osirusoft.com
SPAM: [RBL check: found 12.122.207.200.relays.osirusoft.com., type: 127.0.0.4]
SPAM: RCVD_IN_RFCI (2.3 points) RBL: Received via a relay in ipwhois.rfc-ignorant.org
SPAM: [RBL check: found 12.122.207.200.ipwhois.rfc-ignorant.org., type: 127.0.0.6]
SPAM: X_OSIRU_SPAM_SRC (2.7 points) RBL: DNSBL: sender is Confirmed Spam Source
SPAM:
SPAM: -------------------- End of SpamAssassin results ---------------------
Thanks again.
But I have just one Samba Server as a PDC.
I tried to search for a machine from the other side, and I can't.
I think I found this problem.
I can't ping one machine from the other side with more then 14750 bytes
( ping -l 15000 192.168.2.XXX ).
This is a Fragmentation Problem, isn't it?
Do you or someone can tell me how to solve this new problem?
How can I make lower my packets? ( Exemple: Using a lower key, lower
Cripto, etc. And how to do it )
Thanks a lot,
Jfabricio
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken Bantoft" <ken_at_freeswan.ca>
To: "Jfabricio - Departamento de TI" <jfabricio_at_greenwichint.com.br>
Cc: <users_at_lists.freeswan.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 4:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Users] Samba Authentication
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>
> On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Jfabricio - Departamento de TI wrote:
>
> > Thanks for your tips, but I allways setup my workstations with
NetBeuis
> > Over Tcp/Ip.
> >
> > I was checking with IPTRAF, and when I use a real Domain/Group name
the
> > NetBeuis packets does not pass throuth the IPSEC Tunnel. Then I have the
> > following message: There was no server to authenticate.
>
> Then you have a local workstation/server that is announcing itself as a
> domain level master browser. Possibly either a Win2K/NT or Smaba server
> misconfigured to act as a PDC/BDC. So the local clients *think* it's
> responsble for domain XXXXX and query it instead of sending the requests
> to the real server.
>
> >
> > When I use the real IP from the server, the NetBeuis Packets pass
> > throuth the IPSEC Tunnel. But I have the wrong password or
> > denied access message.
> >
> > Do you or someone, have any idea to make me solve this problem?
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Jfabricio
> >
>
> - --
> Ken Bantoft The Unoffical FreeS/WAN Site:
> ken_at_freeswan.ca http://www.freeswan.ca
> PGP Key: finger ken_at_bantoft.org
> "We can factor the number 15 with quantum computers. We
> can also factor the number 15 with a dog trained to bark
> three times." -- Robert Harley, 5/12/01, Sci.crypt
> "It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong."
> -- Voltaire
> "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development
> of an easy way to factor large prime numbers."
> -- Bill Gates from The Road Ahead, p265
> "An essential element of freedom is the right to privacy,
> a right that cannot be expected to stand against an
> unremitting technological attack." -- Whitfield Diffie
> "Anyone who considers arithmetical methods of producing
> random digits is, of course, in a state of sin."
> -- John Von Neumann, 1951
> "Random numbers should not be generated with a method
> chosen at random." -- Donald Knuth,
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: 2.6.3ia
> Charset: noconv
>
> iQCVAwUBPeULA1iWUusaxGxpAQEtbQP9Fq+ZVreI/nirbbHtS0jsVZajEK+D7suI
> MmWmD5E0TcgcN+8iwdtmbQML/7j80bQ20AEQND4tE4efjUqU8NDuHkuIHommg2R7
> WVVc34RB3vdRviupqHnxRbPVvUzJQLZ32Dg38C2oZ4FbpwNnUdMM/bs+rb6Qb6Gc
> bQbh0EuYN7U=
> =fnZI
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 28 2002 - 05:20:53 CET