Re: [Users] rp_filter on ipsec0

From: martin f krafft (madduck_at_madduck.net)
Date: Thu Nov 28 2002 - 12:01:07 CET

Next message: Ken Bantoft: "Re: [Users] load balancing freeS/WAN"
Previous message: Andreas Steffen: "Re: [Users] What is the best winclient (not free), which support rsa"
In reply to: Stephen J. Bevan: "[Users] rp_filter on ipsec0"
Next in thread: Stephen J. Bevan: "Re: [Users] rp_filter on ipsec0"
Reply: Stephen J. Bevan: "Re: [Users] rp_filter on ipsec0"
Reply: Mark Weaver: "RE: [Users] rp_filter on ipsec0"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

also sprach Stephen J. Bevan <stephen_at_dino.dnsalias.com> [2002.11.28.0430 +0100]:
> ipsec0 can have rp_filter set to 1, it is eth0 that has to be 0 and
> then only in certain situations.

why does ipsec warn me about ipsec0 then, if i can set it to 1. are
there situations in which ipsec0.rp_filter=1 will mess with klips?

-- 
martin;              (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
  \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:" net_at_madduck
 
NOTE: The public PGP keyservers are broken!
Get my key here: http://people.debian.org/~madduck/gpg/330c4a75.asc
 
this site has moved.
we'd tell you where, but then
we'd have to delete you.

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

Next message: Ken Bantoft: "Re: [Users] load balancing freeS/WAN"
Previous message: Andreas Steffen: "Re: [Users] What is the best winclient (not free), which support rsa"
In reply to: Stephen J. Bevan: "[Users] rp_filter on ipsec0"
Next in thread: Stephen J. Bevan: "Re: [Users] rp_filter on ipsec0"
Reply: Stephen J. Bevan: "Re: [Users] rp_filter on ipsec0"
Reply: Mark Weaver: "RE: [Users] rp_filter on ipsec0"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 30 2002 - 05:21:00 CET