Re: [Users] why doesn't `ipsec auto --down <connection>` work?

From: martin f krafft (madduck_at_madduck.net)
Date: Thu Nov 28 2002 - 12:20:48 CET


also sprach Ken Bantoft <ken_at_freeswan.ca> [2002.11.28.0126 +0100]:
> The Notify/DeleteSA patches also come in handy here, for telling the
> other end that you're going away, and to drop the tunnel on it's
> end.

Thanks! I will test it thoroughly and might be able to include it into
Debian's package, which already includes X.509 and the Algos.

Does anyone have any reports on the stability of DeleteSA?

And how about the NAT traversal patch - is that ready for production?

> "We can factor the number 15 with quantum computers. We

[...]

nice collection of quotes, but it seems excessively large for
a single email. wasn't it like 4 lines per signature?

-- 
martin;              (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
  \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:" net_at_madduck
 
chaos reigns within.
reflect, repent, reboot.
order shall return.

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users




This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 29 2002 - 05:21:11 CET