Re: [Users] why doesn't `ipsec auto --down <connection>` work?

From: Sam Sgro (sam_at_freeswan.org)
Date: Thu Nov 28 2002 - 22:55:28 CET

Next message: Stephen J. Bevan: "Re: [Users] rp_filter on ipsec0"
Previous message: inet: "[Users] A funny game"
In reply to: martin f krafft: "Re: [Users] why doesn't `ipsec auto --down <connection>` work?"
Next in thread: Andreas Steffen: "Re: [Users] why doesn't `ipsec auto --down <connection>` work?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, martin f krafft wrote:

> > Thanks! I will test it thoroughly and might be able to include it into
> > Debian's package, which already includes X.509 and the Algos.
>
> oops. Debian also includes DeleteSA already.
>
> How do you use it? I can't find any reference to it...

You shouldn't need to; the Delete/Notify patch just causes FreeS/WAN to
acknowledge and process authenticated Delete SA messages. No configuration is
necessary.

- --
Sam Sgro
sam_at_freeswan.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
Comment: For the matching public key, finger the Reply-To: address.

iQCVAwUBPeaQ0kOSC4btEQUtAQF1xAQA1WSUfpfPsYAZJnpVAepiQpztOwwDNvt1
nFmrUyzFDbysH2qmaSQD1qV/ZMEzhetlN6t//lh6DqFF8dJWMXLxi7qTAUQCnMPo
X3+A8aNlRlz9UR19q9pDpx5F9fG3Ohw1K27oeuVRJhr81UI9TNDiQLdE7cbjUa/K
ReuU5BJz6m4=
=NGLC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Next message: Stephen J. Bevan: "Re: [Users] rp_filter on ipsec0"
Previous message: inet: "[Users] A funny game"
In reply to: martin f krafft: "Re: [Users] why doesn't `ipsec auto --down <connection>` work?"
Next in thread: Andreas Steffen: "Re: [Users] why doesn't `ipsec auto --down <connection>` work?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 29 2002 - 05:21:11 CET