Re: [Users] FreeSwan in real production ?

From: Igmar Palsenberg (maillist_at_jdimedia.nl)
Date: Tue Dec 03 2002 - 13:49:39 CET

• Next message: email_at_hkem.com: "*****SPAM***** [Users] HK Email marking !"
• Previous message: Reinhard Moosauer: "Re: [Users] SSH Sentinel 1.4 with X509 Cert on Smartcard (interop bug?)"
• In reply to: Jouni Rosenlöf: "[Users] FreeSwan in real production ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> Requirements are:
>
> - centralized user management with x.509 certificates (LDAP, Active
> Directory)
>
> -NAT-T support
>
> -IPSec (I know large scale University references with ssh, but not with
> IPsec)
>
> -W2K / XP road warrior (client) support
>
> - support for 50 - 100 simultaneous users
>
> I would like to hear if Open Source VPN has been used anywhere in real
> life large scale enterprise level production

Except for the LDAP / AD stuff I've been there and done it :)

LDAP support is currently something I'm looking in now, but on Novell
since Win2k AD is a big mystery.

        Igmar

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

• Next message: email_at_hkem.com: "*****SPAM***** [Users] HK Email marking !"
• Previous message: Reinhard Moosauer: "Re: [Users] SSH Sentinel 1.4 with X509 Cert on Smartcard (interop bug?)"
• In reply to: Jouni Rosenlöf: "[Users] FreeSwan in real production ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Dec 04 2002 - 05:20:58 CET