[Users] FreeSWAN behind Cisco NAT router?

From: David C. Churchill (dchurch_at_covad.net)
Date: Sat Jan 11 2003 - 07:01:41 CET

• Next message: Fraser Campbell: "[Users] Multipath routing with Freeswan, possible?"
• Previous message: Emiliano: "Re: [Users] Can't connect from Dinamip IP"
• Next in thread: Ken Bantoft: "Re: [Users] FreeSWAN behind Cisco NAT router?"
• Reply: Ken Bantoft: "Re: [Users] FreeSWAN behind Cisco NAT router?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I was wondering if I can install a FreeSWAN gateway behind a Cisco 1604
router with NAT enabled. If so, will I need the NAT-T patch? If I want
Windows 2K road warrior to connect will I need the X509 patch? What about a
gateway to gateway VPN when both Gateways are behind NAT devices? Obviously
I'm a complete newbie to VPN, thanks for your help.
David

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

• text/x-vcard attachment: David_C._Churchill.vcf

• Next message: Fraser Campbell: "[Users] Multipath routing with Freeswan, possible?"
• Previous message: Emiliano: "Re: [Users] Can't connect from Dinamip IP"
• Next in thread: Ken Bantoft: "Re: [Users] FreeSWAN behind Cisco NAT router?"
• Reply: Ken Bantoft: "Re: [Users] FreeSWAN behind Cisco NAT router?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jan 12 2003 - 05:21:07 CET