Re: [Users] Freeswan 1.99 to Cisco 3620 Error: NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN

From: Sean McAvoy (smcavoy_at_megawheels.com)
Date: Fri Jan 10 2003 - 19:53:33 CET


Looks great, thanks!
I noticed the for the cisco (2611) config you specify "group 2"
is this a valid command? I thought that this was specified in the crypto
map per connection. But I am not a cisco person, let alone expert.

On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 22:48, greg wrote:
> Well maybe I should attach the link to the web site...!! Sorry about
> that..Brian Fart..
>
> http://www.diverdown.cc/vpn
>
>
> > Hello,
> > I'm attempting to get a connection working between a Cisco 3620 and
> > Freeswan 1.99. Both are configured to use PSKs, I have followed the
> > interop doc's instructions, when I attempt to bring up the
> > connection I get the follow error: packet from [IP_REMOVED:500:
> > ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN then it
> > fails with: No acceptable response to our first IKE message
> >
> > Is this a possible mis-config on the cisco side?
> >
> > -Sean
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
> > http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
> Greg Robinson
> San Antonio, TX
> AIM: cciggsr
> Never fake the funk!

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jan 12 2003 - 05:21:07 CET