From: greg (greg_at_diverdown.cc)
Date: Fri Jan 10 2003 - 19:48:31 CET
Yes it is a valid cisco command...or at least in that version of IOS I was
using....
> Looks great, thanks!
> I noticed the for the cisco (2611) config you specify "group 2"
> is this a valid command? I thought that this was specified in the crypto
> map per connection. But I am not a cisco person, let alone expert.
>
> On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 22:48, greg wrote:
> > Well maybe I should attach the link to the web site...!! Sorry about
> > that..Brian Fart..
> >
> > http://www.diverdown.cc/vpn
> >
> >
> > > Hello,
> > > I'm attempting to get a connection working between a Cisco 3620 and
> > > Freeswan 1.99. Both are configured to use PSKs, I have followed the
> > > interop doc's instructions, when I attempt to bring up the
> > > connection I get the follow error: packet from [IP_REMOVED:500:
> > > ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN then it
> > > fails with: No acceptable response to our first IKE message
> > >
> > > Is this a possible mis-config on the cisco side?
> > >
> > > -Sean
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Users mailing list
> > > Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
> > > http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
> >
> > Greg Robinson
> > San Antonio, TX
> > AIM: cciggsr
> > Never fake the funk!
Greg Robinson
San Antonio, TX
AIM: cciggsr
Never fake the funk!
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jan 12 2003 - 05:21:07 CET